MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2967426021 · doi:10.1109/itec.2019.8790482

Real-Time Optimal Energy Management of Electrified Powertrains with Reinforcement Learning

2019· article· en· W2967426021 on OpenAlexafffund
Atriya Biswas, Pier Giuseppe Anselma, Ali Emadi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsPowertrainReinforcement learningEnergy managementComputer scienceEnergy management systemOptimal controlDynamic programmingQ-learningProcess (computing)Bellman equationControl engineeringEnergy (signal processing)Mathematical optimizationEngineeringArtificial intelligenceTorqueAlgorithmMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reinforcement learning (RL)algorithm is employed in solving energy management problem for electrified powertrain in real-world driving scenarios and the application process is streamlined. A near-global optimal control policy is articulated for the energy management system (EMS) using Q-learning algorithm which is real-time implementable. The core of the EMS is an updating optimal control policy in the form of a changing look-up table comprising near-global optimal action value function (Q-values) corresponding to all feasible state-action combinations. Using the updating control policy, the EMS can optimally decide power-split between electric machines (EMs) and internal combustion engine (ICE) in real-world driving situations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.171
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectric and Hybrid Vehicle TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207