An Online Reinforcement Learning Wing-Tracking Mechanism for Flexible Wing Aircraft
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Flexible wing aircraft are gaining an increasing interest due to their salient features, such as inexpensive market price, low-cost operation, in-flight robustness, multi-purpose use, and their ability to operate with very little infrastructure. The continuous variations in the aerodynamics of the wing and additionally the kinematic and dynamic constraints that evolve due to the wing-fuselage interactions make the modeling task of such systems ultimately challenging. An online model-free adaptive control mechanism based on two linear actuation systems is proposed in this manuscript to fulfill different pitch-roll maneuvers. The mechanism employs model-free tracking control strategies and utilizes a real-time value iteration-based reinforcement learning process. The adaptation of the control gains is accomplished online using means of adaptive critics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it