MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2967449243 · doi:10.23919/ecc.2019.8796195

Optimal Longitudinal Trajectory Planning for a Quadrotor UAV Including Linear Drag Effects

2019· article· en· W2967449243 on OpenAlexaff
Bruno Carvalho, Luís Rodrigues

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRobotic Path Planning Algorithms
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOptimal controlDragSmoothnessTrajectoryControl theory (sociology)Parameterized complexityMathematical optimizationComputer sciencePontryagin's minimum principlePareto principleControl (management)MathematicsEngineeringAlgorithmAerospace engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work proposes a methodology for determining the optimal trajectories of a quadrotor UAV in the sense of a trade-off between a control energy cost and a time-related cost under the influence of linear drag. The consideration of such a trade-off is motivated by the need to find efficient strategies to deal with battery-powered UAVs having limited battery charge. The problem is formulated as a free terminal time optimal control problem using a trade-off cost index and solutions are derived using the Pontryagin's Minimum Principle (PMP). The results show the sensitivity to drag effects of some important quantities such as trajectory smoothness, control energy, and final time. One of the important contributions of the methodology proposed in this paper is that it provides a Pareto optimal curve that is parameterized by the drag coefficient divided by the mass of the vehicle. Extensive simulation plots, including the Pareto optimal curve, show the results of the proposed method for different drag coefficients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.206
Threshold uncertainty score0.949

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobotic Path Planning AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207