MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2967475164 · doi:10.1109/eucnc.2019.8801991

Co-Operative and Hybrid Replacement Caching for Multi-Access Mobile Edge Computing

2019· article· en· W2967475164 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCaching and Content Delivery
Canadian institutionsExfo Electro-Optical Engineering (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCacheComputer networkMobile edge computingLatency (audio)Enhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionDistributed computingReachabilityServerAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multi-Access Mobile Edge Computing (MEC) is proclaimed as a key technology for reducing service processing delays in 5G networks. Caching on MEC will decrease service latency and improve data access by allowing direct content delivery through the edge without fetching content from the remote server, Caching on MEC is also deemed as an effective approach that guarantees more reachability due to proximity to end-users. This paper proposes a novel hybrid content caching replacement algorithm in MEC to increase its caching efficiency where future request references are predicted using a polynomial fit algorithm along with Lagrange interpolation. Additionally, a distributed co-operative caching algorithm to improve data access within MECs. Experimental results have shown that the proposed scheme obtains more cache hits and lesser average CPU utilization due to its selective caching approach when compared with existing traditional cache replacement algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.926
Threshold uncertainty score0.414

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCaching and Content DeliveryFrench-language works237,207