MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2967590721 · doi:10.1190/segam2019-3196450.1

Pure P- and S-wave elastic reverse time migration with adjoint state method imaging condition

2019· article· en· W2967590721 on OpenAlexaff
Jorge Monsegny, Daniel Trad

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeismic migrationAmplitudeCurl (programming language)Displacement (psychology)Particle displacementPhysicsVertical displacementState (computer science)P waveMathematical analysisGeometryOpticsGeologyAlgorithmMathematicsComputer scienceGeophysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We implemented an elastic reverse time migration based on a coupled system of pure P- and S-wave particle velocities. The system utilizes finite difference wavefields for P- and S-wave particle velocity in vertical and horizontal directions (vpx, vpz, vsx and vsz), and for 2-D displacement divergence and curl (A and B). In contrast with the usual elastic imaging conditions that cross-correlates vertical displacements to obtain the P-wave image and vertical and horizontal displacements to obtain the converted wave image, we devised P- and S-wave imaging conditions using the adjoint state method. The resulting imaging conditions cross-correlate spatial derivatives of A and B wavefields with P- and S-wave displacements. The proposed migration shows a better reflector definition and more balanced amplitudes than the usual vertical and horizontal particle displacement cross-correlations. Presentation Date: Wednesday, September 18, 2019 Session Start Time: 9:20 AM Presentation Start Time: 9:20 AM Location: Poster Station 10 Presentation Type: Poster

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques→French-language works237,207→