MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2967604996 · doi:10.1109/icmew.2019.00-69

Fine Detection and Classification of Multi-class Barcode in Complex Environments

2019· article· en· W2967604996 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicQR Code Applications and Technologies
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBarcodeComputer scienceQuadrilateralDecoding methodsFeature (linguistics)Code (set theory)Artificial intelligenceClass (philosophy)Pattern recognition (psychology)Computer visionData miningTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Barcode, including one-dimensional (1D) barcode and two-dimensional (2D) barcode, can be seen almost anywhere in our lives. In many barcode-based mobile systems, different barcodes will appear simultaneously with different angles, shapes, and image quality. Barcode localization is a significant prerequisite for barcode decoding in these applications. In this paper, we use a region-based end-to-end network with a quadrilateral regression layer to finely localize and classify 1D barcode and Quick Response (QR) code. In addition, we use a multi-scale feature fusion layer to improve the detection accuracy of small scale barcode in complex environments. Extensive experiments on existing public datasets and our own dataset demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.776
Threshold uncertainty score0.151

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicQR Code Applications and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207