MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2967621950 · doi:10.1002/adts.201900123

Toroidal Dipole Resonances in All‐Dielectric Oligomer Metasurfaces

2019· article· en· W2967621950 on OpenAlexaff
Guanqiao Zhang, Chuwen Lan, Rui Gao, Yongzheng Wen, Ji Zhou

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Theory and Simulations · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMetamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsToroidDipoleMultipole expansionDielectricPhysicsElectromagnetic fieldPolarization (electrochemistry)PlasmonMaterials scienceOpticsOptoelectronicsChemistryPlasmaQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Dynamic toroidal multipoles have been attracting an increasing amount of attention, thanks to their unique electromagnetic properties. The concept bears great promises in the field of optical sensing as well as electromagnetic energy localization. Metal‐based structures with specific designs have been widely adopted to obtain toroidal responses. However, applications for such structures are often hindered by the significant intrinsic loss when it comes to optical frequencies. Here, several configurations of all‐dielectric metasurfaces, in which the meta‐molecules are composed of disk oligomers (trimer, quadrumer, pentamer, and hexamer), are proposed to support toroidal dipole resonances in the near‐infrared waveband when the polarization of the normally incident excitation plane wave is directed to one of the symmetry axes of the oligomers. Multipole expansion including the toroidal dipole term along with near‐field electromagnetic patterns confirms the existence of strong toroidal dipolar responses within certain wavelength ranges. This work would enrich the diversity of the all‐dielectric optical systems with toroidal dipole resonances.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced Theory and SimulationsSame topicMetamaterials and Metasurfaces ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207