MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2967669822

Strategi Meningkatkan Kesejahteraan Umat Berbasis Masjid: Studi pada Crisis Center Dhuafa' Masjid Baitul Mukminin Vancouver Puri Surya Jaya Gedangan Sidoarjo

2019· dissertation· id· W2967669822 on OpenAlex
Ilmi Hanafis Yahya

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDigilib UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya (UIN Sunan Ampel) · 2019
Typedissertation
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSMEs Development and Digital Marketing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhysicsEngineeringArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Skripsi yang berjudul “Strategi Meningkatkan Kesejahteraan Umat Berbasisi Masjid Studi Pada Crisis Center Dhuafa’ Masjid Baitul Mukminin Vancouver Puri Surya Jaya Gedangan Sidoarjo” ini membahas mengenai strategi yang digunakan oleh Masjid Baitul Mukminin dalam menyejahterakan umat di Gedangan Sidoarjo. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menjawab rumusan masalah bagaimana strategi meningkatkan kesejahteraan berbasis masjid tersebut dan juga bagaimana peningkatan kesejahteraan dengan adanya strategi tersebut. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitataif dengan menggunakan teknik analisis kualitataif deskriptif. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan metode wawancara, observasi dan dokumentasi. Sumber data didapat secara langsung melalui wawancara kepada Founder Crisis Center Dhuafa’ dan juga para penerima program Crisis Center Dhuafa’. Hasil penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa strategi yang digunakan Masjid Baitul Mukminin untuk meningkatkan kesejahteraan umat adalah dengan membentuk Crisis Center Dhuafa’. Dimana Crisis Center Dhuafa ini memiliki program-program yang digunakan sebagai strategi meningkatkan kesejahteraan umat. Adapun peningkatan kesejahteraan tersebut berupa bertambahnya pendapatan para pengusaha penerima program BAMBU (Bantuan Modal Berwirausaha), berkuranganya alokasi biaya konsumsi para penerima PASTA (Paket Sembako Cinta Dhuafa’), kemudahan untuk melanjutkan pendidikan para penerima SANTAN (Santunan Pendidikan Anak Yatim), kemudahan untuk mendapatkan layanan kesehatan bagi para penerima program DAHSYAT (Dana Sehat Umat), kemudahan mendapatkan fasilitas tempat tinggal para penerima SEDAP (Sedekah Tanggap), dan kemudahan mendapatkan tempat tinggal bagi para penerima program Pos Kemanusiaan. Crisis Center Dhuafa’ diharapkan bisa mempertahankan dan mengembangkan strategi tersebut dari segi penghimpunan dana dan pendistribusiannya agar semakin banyak umat yang tersejahterakan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.504
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.005
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0050.001
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it