Underwater Acoustic Target Recognition: A Combination of Multi-Dimensional Fusion Features and Modified Deep Neural Network
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A method with a combination of multi-dimensional fusion features and a modified deep neural network (MFF-MDNN) is proposed to recognize underwater acoustic targets in this paper. Specifically, due to the complex and changeable underwater environment, it is difficult to describe underwater acoustic signals with a single feature. The Gammatone frequency cepstral coefficient (GFCC) and modified empirical mode decomposition (MEMD) are developed to extract multi-dimensional features in this paper. Moreover, to ensure the same time dimension, a dimension reduction method is proposed to obtain multi-dimensional fusion features in the original underwater acoustic signals. Then, to reduce redundant features and further improve recognition accuracy, the Gaussian mixture model (GMM) is used to modify the structure of a deep neural network (DNN). Finally, the proposed underwater acoustic target recognition method can obtain an accuracy of 94.3% under a maximum of 800 iterations when the dataset has underwater background noise with weak targets. Compared with other methods, the recognition results demonstrate that the proposed method has higher accuracy and strong adaptability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".