MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2967852196 · doi:10.1109/tc.2019.2906881

An Absorbing Markov Chain Based Model to Solve Computation and Communication Tradeoff in GPU-Accelerated MDRUs for Safety Confirmation in Disaster Scenarios

2019· article· en· W2967852196 on OpenAlexaff
Bomin Mao, Fengxiao Tang, Zubair Md. Fadlullah, Nei Kato

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Computers · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsLakehead UniversityThunder Bay Regional Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceOverhead (engineering)ComputationMarkov chainFlexibility (engineering)Distributed computingNetwork packetShared resourceParallel computingEmbedded systemComputer networkAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The fast increasing chip processing capacities driven by the Moore's Law have encouraged the academia and industry to consider more about general hardware architectures since they allow the repeated use for multiple purposes through the installations of applications. Some techniques utilizing the general hardware architectures have been developed to improve the flexibility of computer networks, such as the Software Defined Networking (SDN) and the Network Functions Virtualization (NFV). For these networks, the applications are required to be computation/communication-efficient since the installed applications share the hardware. In this paper, we study the resource-limited disaster recovery networks constructed by the Movable and Deployable Resource Units (MDRUs) which consist of various general computation platforms. We propose an efficient safety confirmation method through the photo sharing by the survivors. In the proposal, the Absorbing Markov Chain is utilized to model the safety confirmation process, transition matrix of which can be adopted to choose the suitable photo size for optimizing the traffic overhead and buffer consumption. Through periodical update of the photo database, unnecessary packet transmissions can be further avoided with reasonable sacrifice of the computation overhead. To expedite the computation, the GPU-accelerated MDRU is considered to conduct the matrix calculations in a parallel fashion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on ComputersSame topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207