Static recrystallization of pure titanium after cryo-deformation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Commercially-pure (CP) titanium was first processed via cryogenic deformation to activate high-density deformation twins, and was subsequently annealed at 500°C to induce static recrystallization (SRX). Two types of twins were mainly activated during cryogenic deformation, i.e. , <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="block" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>{</mml:mo> <mml:mn>11</mml:mn> <mml:mover accent="true"> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:mo>¯</mml:mo> </mml:mover> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:mo>}</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> contraction twins and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="block" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>{</mml:mo> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> <mml:mover accent="true"> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mo>¯</mml:mo> </mml:mover> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:mo>}</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> extension twins. Multiple point-like twins were also present because the growth of twins was remarkably impeded at the low temperature. During annealing the recrystallization mechanisms were identified to be <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="block" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>{</mml:mo> <mml:mn>11</mml:mn> <mml:mover accent="true"> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:mo>¯</mml:mo> </mml:mover> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:mo>}</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="block" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>{</mml:mo> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> <mml:mover accent="true"> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mo>¯</mml:mo> </mml:mover> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:mo>}</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> twinning induced SRX. The point-like twins could effectively promote the occurrence of SRX. The grains were significantly refined from ∼40 to ∼2.7 μm while a few <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="block" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>{</mml:mo> <mml:mn>11</mml:mn> <mml:mover accent="true"> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:mo>¯</mml:mo> </mml:mover> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:mo>}</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="block" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>{</mml:mo> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> <mml:mover accent="true"> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mo>¯</mml:mo> </mml:mover> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:mo>}</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> TBs still retained with the same twinning angle/axis relationship during annealing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".