Cone penetration test (CPT)-based subsurface soil classification and zonation in two-dimensional vertical cross section using Bayesian compressive sampling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A novel method is developed in this study for soil classification and zonation in a two-dimensional (2D) vertical cross section using cone penetration tests (CPTs). A CPT is usually performed vertically and the number of CPT soundings in a site is often limited in geotechnical engineering practice. It is, therefore, difficult to properly interpret CPT results along the horizontal direction or accurately estimate the horizontal correlation length of CPT data. The method proposed in this study bypasses the difficulty in estimating horizontal correlation length and provides proper identification of subsurface soil stratification (i.e., soil layer number is constant along horizontal direction) and zonation (i.e., soil layer number varies along horizontal direction) in a 2D vertical cross section directly from a limited number of CPT soundings. The proposed method consists of three key elements: 2D interpolation of CPT data using 2D Bayesian compressive sampling; determination of soil behavior type (SBT) using a SBT chart at every location in the 2D section, including locations with measurements and unsampled locations; and soil layer or zone delineation using an edge detection method. Both simulated and real data examples are used to illustrate the proposed method. Results show that the method performs well even when only five sets of CPT soundings are available.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".