MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2968095367 · doi:10.1111/cid.12832

Evaluation of FGF‐23 and 25(OH)D<sub>3</sub> levels in peri‐implant sulcus fluid in peri‐implant health and diseases

2019· article· en· W2968095367 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Şükran Acıpınar, Meltem Karşıyaka Hendek, Ebru Olgun, Üçler Kısa

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicTemporomandibular Joint Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersKırıkkale Üniversitesi
KeywordsPeriMedicineImplantPeri-implantitisSulcusVitamin D and neurologyMucositisDentistryDental implantGastroenterologyInternal medicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background There are limited studies to date investigating vitamin D and fibroblast growth factor (FGF)‐23 in different peri‐implant conditions. Purpose To evaluate the peri‐implant sulcus fluid (PISF) FGF‐23 and 25‐hydroxy‐vitamin D 3 (25(OH)D 3 ) levels in peri‐implant health and diseases. Materials and Methods A total of 90 dental implant sites (peri‐implant healthy group [n = 30], peri‐implant mucositis group [n = 30], and peri‐implantitis group [n = 30]) in 53 participants were included in the study. Probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), suppuration (S), modified plaque index (mPI), gingival index (GI), modified sulcus bleeding index (mSBI), and keratinized mucosa width (KMW) were recorded as clinical parameters, and PISF samples were obtained. FGF‐23 and 25(OH)D 3 levels were analyzed by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay. Results There were no statistically significant differences in FGF‐23 concentrations among the groups ( P > .05). The 25(OH)D 3 concentration was significantly lower in peri‐implantitis group compared with the other two groups ( P < .05). The mean total amount of FGF‐23 in the peri‐implantitis group was significantly higher than the peri‐implant healthy group whereas 25(OH)D 3 total amount was significantly lower in the peri‐implantitis group than the peri‐implant healthy group. The 25(OH)D 3 concentration was significantly negatively correlated with CAL, PD, mPI, S, GI, and mSBI and statistically significant relationship was found between FGF‐23 total amount and these clinical parameters ( P < .05). There was a negligible positive correlation between 25(OH)D 3 and FGF‐23 concentrations (τ = 0.169; P = .018). Conclusion Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that FGF‐23 and vitamin D seems to affect peri‐implant bone health, and further studies are needed to explain the association between FGF‐23 and 25(OH)D 3 in peri‐implant conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.241
GPT teacher head0.544
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Implant Dentistry and Related ResearchSame topicTemporomandibular Joint DisordersFrench-language works237,207