De l’importance de la proximité dans la capacité de résister aux chocs exogènes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article analyse l’impact des externalites spatiales et de la proximite geographique sur la capacite a resister aux chocs exogenes a partir d’une etude empirique de la survie d’entreprises individuelles dans la region du Bas-Saint-Laurent (Canada) entre 2006 et 2011. Bien que les externalites traditionnelles offrent de faibles preuves, nos resultats montrent que la proximite d’une variete d’industries apparentees de meme que la densite locale des liens entre fournisseurs et clients favorisent la survie des entreprises au cours de la periode. Ces effets ne sont toutefois pas uniformes dans l’espace – la proximite geographique modulant la capacite de resistance aux chocs. Nos resultats montrent que repartition spatiale des entreprises, meme dans des regions peripheriques et a faible densite, structure une variete de liens localises et de relations de proximite, qui jouent un role significatif sur la capacite de resistance des entreprises aux chocs economiques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".