MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2968118556

Digital Re-imagination Colloquium 2018: Preparing South Africa for a Digital Future through e-Skills

2018· book· en· W2968118556 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Hossana Twinomurinzi, Tendani Mawela, Kanye Rampa, Mymoena Imail

Bibliographic record

VenueUnisa Institutional Repository (University of South Africa) · 2018
Typebook
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicInnovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of South AfricaInyuvesi Yakwazulu-NataliInternational Development Research Centre
KeywordsPsychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The theme of the 2018 colloquium, "Digital Re-imagination: Preparing South Africa for a Digital
\nFuture through e-Skills" sought to establish an innovative research network through providing
\na platform for government, academia, industry, education and civil society to share research,
\ndata and trends that will contribute to refining the mandate to develop the necessary e-skills
\ncapacity of South Africa
\nWith the dawn of every new age, the nature of work and our relationships change. The impact
\nof these changes to the digital economy affect entire systems of production, management,
\nand governance. For example, government is currently designed as linear and mechanistic
\nyet the digital economy is made up of adaptive systems. William Gibson has famously been
\nquoted for the phrase: "The future is already here — it's just not very evenly distributed."
\nGiven the extant amount of data available today, it is now possible to predict (within some
\nmargins of error) how people will behave in certain situations. Data is increasingly becoming
\nbetter structured and easy to access. The question is, are we ready for the future? Are we
\nready to harness the opportunities that the digital economy has brought? Can the digital
\neconomy make a better South Africa for all?
\nTechnology today is able to perform exponentially better than we can; how then can we create
\nnew industries and new forms of governance? It is critical to re-think how systems are being
\nimplemented. Creativity and innovation is big business in the digital economy. Creativity and
\ninnovation moves contributions to beyond the individual and the group - to societal,
\ndisciplinary, national and global level.
\nThe prevalent economic paradigm of a winner who takes it all means that the lower income
\nearners are increasingly more dissatisfied. One of the symptoms of any illness is pain. Pain
\ncan be seen in our society in the form of unemployment, poverty and the dissatisfaction with
\nthe status quo. The challenges in our society cry out for change - a new way of thinking about
\nemployment, wealth creation and governance. What are the real opportunities that the digital
\neconomy presents to the people of South Africa? Real opportunities are those which are not
\nonly available substantively, but are also achievable by the people for who they are created.
\nThe opportunities presented by the digital economy can only become real if we e-skill people
\nto take advantage of those opportunities. Countries in the East have been able to adapt
\ntechnologies without giving up the cultural values they hold dear. While the challenges we
\nface in South Africa may be seen as a problem, they also present an opportunity to make a
\ndifference with Digital Skills. It is no longer enough to have a skill; technology, talent and
\ninsight are becoming critical as well.
\nThe colloquium received 13 submissions. These submissions include four full papers, one
\nconcept note and eight abstracts. The submissions were all blind peer reviewed by at least
\ntwo reviewers. None of the authors nor editors were involved in reviewing their own
\nsubmissions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.821
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUnisa Institutional Repository (University of South Africa)Same topicInnovative Approaches in Technology and Social DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207