MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effects of H <sub>1</sub> /H <sub>2</sub> histamine receptor blockade on mitochondrial function in rodent brain following prolonged exercise

2018· article· en· W2968133343 on OpenAlexaffabout
Helen E. Wallace, Laura R. Davidson, Mackenzie CW. Bell, Karen Brebner, Daniel A. Kane

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicMast cells and histamine
Canadian institutionsSt. Francis Xavier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistamine receptorEndocrinologyInternal medicineHistamineChemistryHippocampusReceptorPharmacologyMedicineAntagonist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Exercise has been shown to stimulate histamine release, which mediates vasodilation in exercising tissue and is sustained post‐exercise. Blockade of H 1 and H 2 receptors with antihistamine drugs attenuates this effect in skeletal muscle. Research examining the effects of exercise‐related histamine action on cellular level processes is relatively sparse. There also remains limited understanding of the impacts of histamine receptor blockade on non‐exercising tissue, such as the brain. To this end, 36 adult male Wistar rats (75–94 days old, 441.2 ± 39.5 g body wt) were randomly assigned to three groups: (1) given H 1 and H 2 receptor antagonists fexofenadine (7.11 mg/kg) and ranitidine (3.95 mg/kg) via oral gavage 1 hr prior to treadmill exercise (1 hr, 20 cm/s); (2) completed the exercise without drug, and (3) control. All groups received body mass‐proportional oral gavage volumes (water or antihistamines). One hour post‐exercise, mitochondrial function was assessed in saponin‐permeabilized prefrontal cortex and dorsal hippocampus brain sub‐regions. There was no effect of exercise or drug treatment on mitochondrial substrate‐dependent oxygen consumption ( J O 2 ; high‐resolution respirometry), or in mitochondrial hydrogen peroxide emission (mH 2 O 2 ; fluorometric monitoring of Amplex Red oxidation) in permeabilized prefrontal cortex or the dorsal hippocampus. These results suggest negligible effects of oral H 1 /H 2 antagonists on mitochondrial metabolism in brain following exercise. This supports prior evidence suggesting the effects of H 1 /H 2 inhibition remain localized in exercising muscle. Other studies report systemic increases in histamine levels following exercise, however, which suggests further research may reveal a relationship between histamine receptor blockade and cellular processes in non‐exercising tissues. Support or Funding Information The Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), The Nova Scotia Health Research Foundation (NSHRF), and Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI) This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicMast cells and histamineFrench-language works237,207