MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2968308266 · doi:10.21105/joss.01294

PyBIDS: Python tools for BIDS datasets

2019· article· en· W2968308266 on OpenAlexaff
Tal Yarkoni, Christopher J. Markiewicz, Alejandro de la Vega, Krzysztof J. Gorgolewski, Taylor Salo, Yaroslav O. Halchenko, Quinten McNamara, Krista DeStasio, Jean‐Baptiste Poline, Dmitry Petrov, Valérie Hayot-Sasson, Dylan M. Nielson, Johan D. Carlin, Gregory Kiar, Kirstie Whitaker, Elizabeth DuPré, Adina Wagner, Lee S. Tirrell, Mainak Jas, Michael Hanke, Russell A. Poldrack, Oscar Estéban, Stefan Appelhoff, Chris Holdgraf, Isla Staden, Bertrand Thirion, Dave Kleinschmidt, John Anthony Lee, Matteo di Castello, Michael Notter, Ross Blair

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Open Source Software · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Physics and Python Applications
Canadian institutionsMontreal Neurological Institute and HospitalConcordia UniversityMcGill University
FundersNational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and BioengineeringNational Institute of Mental HealthNational Institutes of HealthNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPython (programming language)Computer scienceProgramming languageWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Brain imaging researchers regularly work with large, heterogeneous, high-dimensional datasets.Historically, researchers have dealt with this complexity idiosyncratically, with every lab or individual implementing their own preprocessing and analysis procedures.The resulting lack of field-wide standards has severely limited reproducibility and data sharing and reuse.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesOpen science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: Software
Teacher disagreement score0.994
Threshold uncertainty score0.305

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0060.008
Research integrity0.0010.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0910.059

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations68
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Open Source SoftwareSame topicComputational Physics and Python ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207