MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2968342319

A strategic reassessment of EU policy in the Mediterranean

2012· book-chapter· en· W2968342319 on OpenAlex
Stephen C. Calleya

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOAR@UM (University of Malta) · 2012
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean Politics and Security
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFörsvarshögskolanMedacUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsMediterranean climatePolitical scienceInternational tradeGeographyBusinessArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The historic transformation that has taken place across the Southern Mediterranean in 2011, with regime change in Tunisia, Egypt and Libya, and upheavals in other Arab countries, demands a strategic reassessment of European Union policy making towards the region.
\nThe complex policy framework that has resulted from the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership, (EMP), the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) and the Union for the Mediterranean (UfM) must be reviewed in light of the new political landscape that has emerged in North Africa. The European Union’s strategic objective must be that of formulating a better coordinated cooperative mechanism in the Mediterranean that provides direct support to the Middle East and North African countries at this delicate moment of political and economic transition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.914
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it