MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2968438106 · doi:10.1002/adfm.201904639

Black Titania with Nanoscale Helicity

2019· article· en· W2968438106 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Functional Materials · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicTiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells
Canadian institutionsFPInnovationsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaEidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich
KeywordsMaterials scienceNanorodMesoporous materialChemical engineeringCalcinationLiquid crystalNanotechnologyNanocompositePhotocatalysisAscorbic acidNanoparticleCatalysisOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The fabrication of mesoporous black titanium dioxide (TiO 2− x ) with a chiral nematic organization of core–shell nanorods is reported. Chiral templating of TiO 2 nanoparticles onto gelatin‐functionalized cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) followed by calcination yields carbonized TiO 2 /CNC helical materials that recover white TiO 2 replicas after carbon removal. The hydrothermal surface reduction of the traditional white TiO 2 by ascorbic acid affords freestanding chiral nematic black TiO 2− x . The black TiO 2− x is a visible light active semiconducting mesoporous structure constructed by chiral nematic crystalline–amorphous TiO 2 core–shell nanorods. The chiral black TiO 2− x nanoparticles supported on mesoporous nanocarbon networks are evaluated as lithium‐ion battery anode electrodes. Beyond the current efforts, these black TiO 2− x materials and their composites may be useful in the fields of energy storage and catalysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it