Black Titania with Nanoscale Helicity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The fabrication of mesoporous black titanium dioxide (TiO2−x ) with a chiral nematic organization of core–shell nanorods is reported. Chiral templating of TiO2 nanoparticles onto gelatin‐functionalized cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) followed by calcination yields carbonized TiO2/CNC helical materials that recover white TiO2 replicas after carbon removal. The hydrothermal surface reduction of the traditional white TiO2 by ascorbic acid affords freestanding chiral nematic black TiO2−x. The black TiO2−x is a visible light active semiconducting mesoporous structure constructed by chiral nematic crystalline–amorphous TiO2 core–shell nanorods. The chiral black TiO2−x nanoparticles supported on mesoporous nanocarbon networks are evaluated as lithium‐ion battery anode electrodes. Beyond the current efforts, these black TiO2−x materials and their composites may be useful in the fields of energy storage and catalysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".