MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2968463625 · doi:10.1080/07038992.2019.1638236

New Approaches for Removing the Effect of Water Damping on SMAP Freeze/Thaw Mapping

2019· article· en· W2968463625 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Cheima Touati, Tahiana Ratsimbazafy, Ralf Ludwig, Monique Bernier

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Remote Sensing · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil Moisture and Remote Sensing
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalCenter for Northern StudiesInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
FundersCanadian Space AgencyNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsBrightness temperatureWater contentEnvironmental scienceBrightnessRemote sensingLinear regressionEmissivityPixelMoistureCalibrationSoil scienceMeteorologyGeographyMathematicsStatisticsPhysicsGeologyOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Northern Quebec landscape is typically covered by numerous lakes. The lowest emissivity of water bodies dominates the brightness temperature (Tb) data measured over this region. Thus, it is necessary to eliminate the effect of water bodies from Tb measurements. The primary objective of this study is to develop two approaches to correct the Soil Moisture Active Passive brightness temperature (SMAP L1C), collected between January and December of 2016, for the damping effect of water bodies within each 36 km by 36 km pixel. The first algorithm normalizes Tb with the intercept of its linear regression versus the water fraction of each pixel. A second algorithm used Tb regression with water fraction by vegetation classes for each scene. Surface soil temperature and moisture measured near Umiujaq were used to validate Tb correction. The proposed Tb corrections resolve the divergence observed with SMAP standard correction when the water fraction is higher than 20%. Corrected brightness temperature is then tested for mapping the soil freeze/thaw state using the Normalized Polarization Ratio. Agreements of up to 90% (ascending orbit) and 79% (descending orbit) were reached for the proposed approach versus 64% and 50% for the existing approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.071

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2019
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Remote SensingSame topicSoil Moisture and Remote SensingFrench-language works237,207