MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2968561912 · doi:10.1136/sextrans-2019-sti.523

P438 Gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men prefer sexual health clinic nurses over family physicians for PrEP delivery

2019· article· en· W2968561912 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePoster presentations · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Canadian institutionsCasey HouseAIDS Committee of TorontoPublic Health OntarioUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of TorontoCanadian AIDS Treatment Information ExchangeWomen's College HospitalOntario HIV Treatment NetworkMaple Leaf Medical ClinicToronto Public HealthSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyFamily medicineReproductive healthMedicineClinical psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Background</h3> More providers are needed to deliver PrEP at scale. We examined intentions to seek PrEP from family physicians (FPs) and sexual health clinic nurses (RNs) within an implementation science study on decentralizing PrEP delivery to gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (gbMSM). <h3>Methods</h3> Strategy A was a knowledge dissemination intervention in which community organizations distributed info-cards to gbMSM considering PrEP. Men used the cards to view an online module and meet with their FPs, who could use the card to complete an accredited e-module about PrEP. Strategy B was an implementation intervention in which gbMSM could instead access PrEP from sexual health RNs. Participants completed an optional survey at baseline and 6 months. We used descriptive statistics to characterize the sample and logistic regression to identify characteristics associated with intentions to seek PrEP from FPs vs RNs. <h3>Results</h3> From 3013 cards distributed, 339 men accessed the module; 179 completed the baseline survey and are included in this analysis. Median (IQR) age was 31 (26,40) years, 97.7% were cisgender males and 46.4% had a prior bacterial STI. Most (n=119, 66.5%) had a FP, of which only 59.5% were ‘out’ to them. Of 97 respondents with a FP and wanting to start PrEP, 35.1% vs 65.0% intended to use Strategy A vs B respectively (p=0.003). In univariable analyses, characteristics associated with intent to approach FPs included being ‘out’ to that doctor (OR=10.67, 95%CI=3.35, 33.96), very good/excellent physician skills in general communication (OR=3.42, 95%CI=1.38, 8.48) and participatory decision-making (OR=3.33, 95%CI=1.14, 9.79). In multivariable analysis, being ‘out’ was the only significant predictor (aOR=14.35, 95%CI=1.59, 129.83). <h3>Conclusion</h3> Among gbMSM with a FP, sexual health clinic RNs were preferred over FPs for PrEP by most. Multiple strategies are needed to increase numbers of PrEP providers, including interventions to help gbMSM feel comfortable disclosing sexual orientation. <h3>Disclosure</h3> No significant relationships.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.639
Threshold uncertainty score0.613

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.418
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it