MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2968584223 · doi:10.1109/uemcon.2018.8796732

Causes of Success in the La Liga and How to Predict them

2018· article· en· W2968584223 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel Klivansky, Mohamad El-Hajj

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicSports Analytics and Performance
Canadian institutionsMacEwan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeagueFootballTournamentLIGAGlobeCertaintyPolitical scienceComputer scienceData scienceOperations researchArtificial intelligenceEngineeringMathematicsPsychologyLawPhilosophyEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Spanish premier football league, La Liga, is considered by many as the best and most exciting league in the world. With Spanish clubs dominating the most competitive tournament in European football, the Champions League, with 18 wins since its inception in 1955, the La Liga draws the attention of hundreds of millions of fans from around the globe. In this article, we use data mining techniques on historical data to predict results, as well as discover what causes some teams to be more successful than others. The goal is to provide predictions with higher certainty than the existing statistical models, and to discover interesting and useful patterns in European Leagues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.155
Threshold uncertainty score0.238

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSports Analytics and PerformanceFrench-language works237,207