MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2968600518 · doi:10.5430/ijfr.v10n6p88

Investigating the Relationships Between Organizational Change, Organizational Climate, and Organizational Performance

2019· article· en· W2968600518 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sri Supriyati, Udin Udin, Sugeng Wahyudi, Mahfudz Mahfudz

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Financial Research · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEmployee Performance and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrganisation climateOrganizational behavior and human resourcesOrganizational commitmentOrganizational learningOrganizational performanceOrganization developmentOrganizational changeOrganizational effectivenessClimate changeOrganizational studiesOrganizational engineeringWork (physics)BusinessPsychologyKnowledge managementEnvironmental resource managementSocial psychologyPublic relationsComputer sciencePolitical scienceMarketingEnvironmental scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aims to analyze the effect of organizational change (i.e., technostructure change, work procedure, and individual) on organizational climate and organizational performance. By using the census technique, the respondents are all employees of regional drinking water company (PDAM) in Kendal regency of Indonesia. Data are analyzed using simple and multiple regression analysis. The results show that technostructure change partially has a significant negative effect on organizational climate, while work procedure and individual change have a significant positive effect on organizational climate. Furthermore, organizational change simultaneously has a significant positive effect on organizational climate and organizational performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.116
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Financial ResearchSame topicEmployee Performance and ManagementFrench-language works237,207