Émotion et réflexivité : le cheminement de l’étudiante Martha pour son orientation universitaire et professionnelle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’orientation d’un étudiant est une activité délicate qui s’élabore à partir d’expériences souvent déstabilisantes, mais transitoires. Afin d’accompagner ce cheminement, l’université met en place des dispositifs pédagogiques propices à développer la réflexivité de l’étudiant relativement à son projet universitaire et professionnel. Cet article porte sur le processus d’orientation d’une étudiante universitaire en relation avec différents modules d’accompagnement. L’entretien d’explicitation est mobilisé : il est apte à documenter la dynamique évolutive de cette étudiante et participe à la conscientisation de ce processus. Il met en lumière les formes d’organisation complexes de l’activité réflexive. L’analyse fine des évocations montre des phénomènes cruciaux pour le développement de la personne concernée, notamment le rôle capital de l’émotion dans le processus de réflexivité sur son devenir.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".