MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The impact of atmospheric acid deposition on tree growth and forest understory vegetation in the Athabasca Oil Sands Region

2019· article· en· W2968642586 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Samuel F. Bartels, Benoît Gendreau-Berthiaume, S. Ellen Macdonald

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Science of The Total Environment · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersWood Buffalo Environmental Association
KeywordsUnderstoryOil sandsEnvironmental scienceDeposition (geology)Vegetation (pathology)Basal areaSpecies richnessForestryBiodiversitySoil acidificationEcologyGeographyCanopyGeologySoil pHSoil waterSoil science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Atmospheric acid deposition is of major concern in the Athabasca Oil Sands Region (AOSR) in northern Alberta, Canada, which is home to the third largest oil reserve in the world. After decades of oil sands production in the AOSR, the potential impact of deposition on forest health, including tree growth and understory biodiversity, is still not clear. We evaluated the relationship of modelled/interpolate atmospheric deposition of nitrogen (N), sulphur (S), base cations (BC), and derived potential acid input (PAI) from surface oil sands mining with: (1) the radial growth (i.e. basal area increment; BAI) of jack pine (Pinus banksiana Lamb.) trees using data from two decadal time periods, prior to (1957-1966) and during (2001-2010) active oil sands development in the AOSR; and (2) forest understory vegetation (abundance, diversity, and composition), which is an important component of forest biodiversity. BAI of jack pine trees varied with N, S, and BC deposition between the two time periods, and with the direction of the site relative to main emission sources. Growth was higher in areas close to the oil sands surface mining operations prior to and after oil sands development. BAI was also positively related to atmospheric deposition in the recent period, but these relationships were weaker in the active period versus the non-active period. Understory vegetation - including vascular plant cover, richness, and diversity - increased in relation to modelled atmospheric N and S deposition. There was limited correlation between soil pH or the BC:Al ratio (indicators of soil acidification) and BAI and understory vegetation responses. No evidence was found for detrimental effects of atmospheric emissions (and subsequent deposition) from oil sands production on tree growth or forest understory vegetation. The results, if anything, suggest a fertilization effect due to enhanced atmospheric deposition of nitrogen compounds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.224
Threshold uncertainty score0.451

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2019
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Science of The Total EnvironmentSame topicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas DynamicsFrench-language works237,207