MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2968695536

Medical Scope:臨床試験からみるカナグリフロジンの有効性と安全性〜CANVASプログラムを中心に〜

2019· article· ja· W2968695536 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
野見山 崇, ほか

Bibliographic record

VenuePharma Medica · 2019
Typearticle
Languageja
FieldMedicine
TopicHeart Failure Treatment and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScope (computer science)Computer scienceBusiness
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SGLT2阻害薬カナグリフロジンを用いたCANVASプログラムが報告された。世界30ヵ国で行われた本研究において,カナグリフロジンは有意に心血管イベントの発症,心不全による入院や心血管死を抑制し,腎臓合併症の進展も抑制した。懸念されるべき副作用として下肢切断や骨折が増えている点が挙げられる。先に行われたEMPAREGOUTCOME®や,後に行われたDECLARE-TIMI 58と共通している点は,心不全による入院の抑制と心血管死の抑制であり,心血管病変の段階の違いこそあれSGLT2阻害薬のクラス・エフェクトといえる。一方,最近のメタ解析の結果で,カナグリフロジンががんを抑制する可能性も報告されており興味深い。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePharma Medica→Same topicHeart Failure Treatment and Management→French-language works237,207→