An Approximation Mechanism for Elastic IoT Application Deployment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Even though Internet of Things (IoT) applications are proliferating exponentially in recent years, there still exist several resource allocation problems in IoT application implementations with the traditional cloud computing. Because the number of IoT applications is increasing day by day with strict latency requirements. They become a burden to the cloud/datacenter platform in order to fulfill a huge number of real-time IoT services. As the emerging solution for latency requirements, the edges can bring processing power closer to datasource - the Thing in IoT. However, with the resource limitation at edges, the efficient resource allocation is a major concern to improve the performance of edge networks. In this work, we introduce the optimization model, named the Service-Oriented Resource Allocation (SORA) for IoT applications, which dynamically consolidates the system so as to reduce the system cost while improving the available resource at the edges. Unfortunately, SORA is unable to solve in polynomial time because it is NP-hard. Unlike the prior works that try to find solutions based on heuristic algorithms, we propose approximation algorithms to solve SORA with a near-optimal solution. Finally, we evaluate our model by providing several simulation cases, in which our proposed mechanisms show outstanding outcomes in terms of solving SORA and resource utilization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".