MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2968718572 · doi:10.2140/memocs.2019.7.99

A polynomial chaos expanded hybrid fuzzy-stochastic model for transversely fiber reinforced plastics

2019· article· en· W2968718572 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematics and Mechanics of Complex Systems · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicProbabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersOtto von Guericke University MagdeburgCollege of Engineering, Michigan State UniversityUniversität Duisburg-EssenFreie Universität BerlinBilkent ÜniversitesiCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillUniversität zu KölnUniversità degli Studi di PaviaAkademie Věd České RepublikyUniversité de LyonUniversität WienDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftMcGill UniversityUniversidad Rey Juan CarlosLouisiana State UniversityUniversity of PittsburghIndian National Science AcademyMichigan State UniversityCarnegie Mellon UniversityVanderbilt UniversityWayne State University
KeywordsCHAOS (operating system)PolynomialFiberFuzzy logicMathematicsMaterials scienceComputer scienceMathematical analysisComposite materialArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work is focused on polymorphic uncertainties in the framework of constitutive modeling for transversely isotropic materials.To this end, we propose a hybrid fuzzy-stochastic model, where the stochastic part accounting for aleatory uncertainties of material parameters is expanded with the multivariate polynomial chaos expansion.In order to account for epistemic uncertainties, polynomial chaos coefficients are treated as fuzzy variables.The underlying minimum and maximum optimization problem for the fuzzy analysis is approximated by α-level discretization, resulting in a separation of minimum and maximum problems.To become more universal, so-called quantities of interest are employed, which allow a general formulation for the target problem.Numerical examples with fuzzy, fuzzy-stochastic, and hybrid fuzzy-stochastic input demonstrate the versatility of the proposed formulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.949
Threshold uncertainty score0.744

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it