Pleomorphic adenoma with bizarre myoepithelial cells: A diagnostic challenge on cytologic smear
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The diagnosis on fine needle aspiration of salivary gland tumors with a myoepithelial component is challenging because myoepithelial cells can have a wide cytomorphologic spectrum. The authors report a case of a pleomorphic adenoma of the parotid gland that expands the spectrum of appearances that myoepithelial cells can show with this tumor. A 55-year-old female was found to have a right parotid gland mass. FNA showed hypercellularity, with loosely cohesive fragments of spindle-shaped myoepithelial cells admixed with small nests of epithelial cells. Interspersed may occasional bizarre cells possessing severely pleomorphic nuclei with hyperchromasia. The cytologic diagnosis was "suspicious for carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma." A total parotidectomy was performed with complete resection of the tumor that was confirmed to be a pleomorphic adenoma. The pleomorphic cells noted on FNA were scattered throughout the tumor, and were positive by immunostaining for keratin, S-100 protein and p63, identifying them as myoepithelial cells. These cells did not show mitotic activity and were negative for Ki67. The pleomorphic adenoma showed extensive degenerative changes including central cyst formation, stromal hyalinization and hemosiderin deposition. On the basis of the combined light microscopic and immunohistochemical findings, there was no evidence to support a malignant change in the pleomorphic adenoma. It was concluded the pleomorphic myoepithelial cells were a degenerative change, reminiscent of what is seen in "ancient" schwannoma and some uterine leiomyomata. Our case expands the spectrum of appearances that can be seen in myoepithelial cells in the salivary gland.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".