MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2968756605 · doi:10.1109/itec.2019.8790474

Offline Parameter Identification and SOC Estimation for New and Aged Electric Vehicles Batteries

2019· article· en· W2968756605 on OpenAlexaff
Ryan Ahmed, Sara Rahimifard, Saied Habibi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOverchargeBattery (electricity)State of healthState of chargeAutomotive engineeringBattery packReliability (semiconductor)Electric vehicleGenetic algorithmEngineeringComputer sciencePower (physics)Control theory (sociology)Control (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The hybrid (HEVs) and battery electric vehicles (BEVs) represent a sustainable alternative in compare to conventional, fossil fuel-based vehicles. Battery pack is a major and the most expensive part of electric vehicles. It requires accuracy, real-time monitoring, and control. Parameters such as state of charge (SOC) and state of health (SOH) have to monitor accurately to guarantee battery safety and reliability and avoid overcharge or under-discharge conditions. These conditions can lead to irreversible capacity degradation and power fade. An accurate battery model with robust estimation method is needed for battery condition monitoring. In this paper, a way to estimate battery parameters is proposed for the first order equivalent circuit battery model (OCV-R-RC) using genetic algorithm (GA) optimization at various ages of the battery to track the changes. The smooth variable structure filter (SVSF) strategy has been considered to estimate the state of charge based on the optimized model. An aging test has been conducted over a period of 12 months using real-world driving scenarios. Experimental results are provided to show the efficacy of the proposed approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.587
Threshold uncertainty score0.258

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchFrench-language works237,207