MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2968773736 · doi:10.1109/memea.2019.8802139

In-Hand Telemanipulation Using a Robotic Hand and Biology-Inspired Haptic Sensing

2019· article· en· W2968773736 on OpenAlexafffund
Vinicius Prado da Fonseca, Bruno Monteiro Rocha Lima, Thiago Eustaquio Alves de Oliveira, Qi Zhu, Voicu Z. Groza, Emil M. Petriu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobot Manipulation and Learning
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersCiência sem FronteirasNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinistério da Educação
KeywordsTeleoperationRobotic handHaptic technologyThumbGrippersTactile sensorArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceTeleroboticsComputer visionRoboticsFuzzy logicRobotObject (grammar)Control engineeringSimulationEngineeringMobile robot

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new approach to the in-hand manipulation problem, using fuzzy controlled teleoperation and a recently proposed multimodal tactile sensor are presented in this article. Real-time grasping experiments were performed by a fuzzy controlled gripper, with a compliant tactile sensor mounted on the gripper. As a new approach for in-hand manipulation and robot dexterity, a teleoperated thumb performed object rotation while the gripper maintained stable grasping. The data from the experiments were consistent and, thus, provided a substantial tool for in-hand control algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobot Manipulation and LearningFrench-language works237,207