Psychanalyse dans un Institut de formation en soins infirmiers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’enseignement de la psychanalyse existe dans les Instituts de Formation en Soins Infirmiers, mais son organisation est aléatoire. Parce qu’il se réfère à un discours sur l’inconscient, il ne va pas de soi dans ce cadre d’apprentissage. Pourquoi et comment la psychanalyse peut faire partie des savoirs nécessaires à des étudiants non avertis, qui ne sont pas supposés savoir et qui sont surtout orientés par la science et les techniques objectives ? Si la psychanalyse se transmet là entre « désir de savoir » et « horreur de savoir », elle révèle derrière le masque la béance qui peut faire advenir le désir. Dans la perspective de formation de sujets soignants et d’un travail clinique sur la relation dans les différents modes d’exercice de la profession, il faut que dans les IFSI les psychanalystes puissent y être !
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.021 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".