MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2968873449

ANADOLU MEDENİYETLERİ MÜZESİ’NİN MEKÂNSAL VE YAPISAL ÖZELLİKLERİNİN ÖNLEYİCİ KORUMA BAĞLAMINDA İRDELENMESİ

2019· article· tr· W2968873449 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Fatma Sezin DOĞRUER

Bibliographic record

VenueDergiPark (Istanbul University) · 2019
Typearticle
Languagetr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Heritage Management and Preservation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Oz Muzelerde yer alan koleksiyon icin sergide, depoda veya tasindiklari sirada koruyucu bir ortam olusturulup, bu ortamin korunmasi gerekmektedir [1] ve bu amacla onleyici koruma calismalari yurutulur Bu calismalar, muzelerdeki eserlere zarar veren etkenlerin engellenmesi, sinirlandirilmasi veya minimuma indirgenmesi amaciyla gerceklestirilen uygulamalardir.  Muze koleksiyonlarinin maruz kaldigi bozulma etkenleri, fiziksel kuvvetler, hirsizlik ve vandalizm, yangin, su, zararlilar, kirletici maddeler, morotesi ve kizilotesi isinlar ile uygun olmayan isik, sicaklik ve bagil nem olarak tanimlanmaktadir. Bu bozulma etkenlerinin onlenmesi, sinirlandirilmasi, tespiti veya bunlara mudahale edilmesi amaciyla yapilan mekânsal ve yapisal duzenlemeler sayesinde muze koleksiyonunda etkin koruma uygulamalarina gerek duyulmadan koruma saglanmaktadir (Kanada Koruma Enstitusu 2015). Tarihi binalardan donusturulen muzelerde, muzecilik ve koruma bakimindan gerekli mekânsal ve yapisal duzenlemeler, binada yurutulen restorasyon ve teshir-tanzim calismalari sirasinda yapilmaktadir. Tarihi binalarin koleksiyonun bir parcasi olarak dusunulmesi ve yapinin bozulmalara karsi korunmasi gerekmektedir (Kokten 2007: 59). Makale kapsaminda 1930’lu yillarda 15. yuzyil yapilarindan devlet muzesine donusturulen Anadolu Medeniyetleri Muzesi’nin mekânsal ve yapisal ozellikleri onleyici koruma bakimindan incelenmistir. Anahtar Sozcukler: Muzecilik, Muze Tasarimi, Muze Projesi, Onleyici Koruma, Bozulma Etkenleri Abstract A protective environment should be created and maintained for the museum collection in the exhibition or storage areas; or during its transportation (ICOM 2006); and for this purpose preventive conservation works are done. These works are the practices that are carried out in order to prevent, limit or minimize the deterioration agents for the artifacts in the museums. The agents of deterioration, to which artefacts are exposed, are defined as physical forces, thieves and vandals, fire, water, pests, pollutants, improper light, ultraviolet and infrared, improper temperature and improper relative humidity. Thanks to the spatial and structural arrangements in order to avoid, block and minimize these agents of deterioration, museum collection’s conservation is provided without need of active conservation implementations (Canadian Conservation Institute 2015). In the museums converted from historical buildings, spatial and structural arrangements required in terms of museology and conservation are made during the restoration and exhibition works carried out in the building. Historical buildings should be considered as a part of the collection and the building should be protected against deterioration (Kokten 2007: 59). In the scope of the article, spatial and structural features of Anatolian Civilisations Museum, which is transformed from 15th century buildings into state museum in 1930s, were examined in terms of preventive conservation. Keywords: Museuology, Museum Design, Museum Project, Preventive Conservation, Agents of Deterioration [1] URL 1 http://icomturkey.org/tr/icom-m%C3%BCzecilik-etik-yasas%C4%B1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.600
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0350.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.154 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDergiPark (Istanbul University)Same topicCultural Heritage Management and PreservationFrench-language works237,207