MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2968876691 · doi:10.1109/itec.2019.8790576

Junction Temperature Estimation Based on Updating RC Network for Different Liquid Cooling Conditions

2019· article· en· W2968876691 on OpenAlexaff
Fei Gao, Berker Bilgin, Jennifer Bauman

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSilicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoolantJunction temperatureReliability (semiconductor)Insulated-gate bipolar transistorTransient (computer programming)Power (physics)Automotive engineeringTemperature measurementNuclear engineeringWater coolingEngine coolant temperature sensorController (irrigation)ThermalMaterials scienceConvertersComputer scienceMechanical engineeringEngineeringElectrical engineeringVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The failure of power converters and inverters due to thermal stress can threaten the safety and reliability of electrical vehicles (EVs). Junction temperature estimation for power devices is the key factor to maintain safe operation and to extend power device lifetime. This paper proposes a detailed transient Foster thermal model with updating RC parameters at 216 cooling conditions based on coolant flowrate (5L/min to 10.5L/min) and coolant temperature (5°C to 90°C) since the liquid coolant is the major heat dissipating path in the module. The vehicle controller can store and keep updating these 216 RC values based on the coolant temperature and coolant flowrate measurements to provide accurate online IGBT junction temperature estimation. Test data from supplier is used to validate the model at selected operating points.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.156
Threshold uncertainty score0.598

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSilicon Carbide Semiconductor TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207