MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2968879609 · doi:10.1139/cjce-2018-0703

Owner requirements in as-built BIM deliverables and a system architecture for FM-specific BIM representation

2019· article· en· W2968879609 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Priscila Daher Russo Dias, Semiha Ergan

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBIM and Construction Integration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBuilding information modelingFacility managementTask (project management)DeliverableComputer scienceTask managementSystems engineeringRepresentation (politics)ArchitectureInformation modelPlan (archaeology)Process managementEngineeringSoftware engineeringOperations management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Construction models received by owners typically include the details of components required for construction activities; yet at the same time, they might not be in the right geometric representation for facilities management (FM) tasks. There is a need to customize BIMs for each FM task and eliminate unnecessary data in models for that task. The objective of this work is to identify information items that should be included in BIMs to support specific FM tasks and the level of geometric details of components to be represented in BIMs. The research focuses on supporting four major FM tasks as corrective and preventive maintenance management, asset management on HVAC systems, and space management tasks. This paper also provides a system architecture to enable reducing content of BIMs for FM tasks. Contributions will help practitioners to use facility data from a life cycle perspective through BIM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.209
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Civil EngineeringSame topicBIM and Construction IntegrationFrench-language works237,207