Force depression following a stretch‐shortening cycle depends on the amount of residual force enhancement established in the initial stretch phase
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Studies on residual force enhancement (rFE) and residual force depression (rFD) of the muscle-tendon unit (MTU) have typically been conducted independent of each other, with little information available on how stretch-induced rFE affects the shortening phase and the steady-state MTU isometric force at the end of stretch-shortening cycles (SSCs). We showed previously that when rFE is kept constant, but the force at the end of the stretch is varied by changing the stretch speed, the steady-state forces at the end of SSCs were the same. These results led to the hypothesis that the amount of rFE of the MTU established in the initial stretch phase of SSCs determines the steady-state force following the shortening phase of SSCs. This study was aimed at testing this hypothesis. Steady-state MTU isometric thumb adduction forces were measured for pure isometric contractions, following pure shortening contractions, following pure stretch contractions, and following SSCs with constant shortening speed and magnitude. However, two stretch magnitudes (30° and 10° thumb abduction) and stretch speeds (15°/sec and ~ 60°/sec, respectively) were chosen such that forces at the end of the stretch phase of the SSCs were the same, while rFE differed substantially. As hypothesized, the steady-state isometric MTU forces following SSCs were positively related to the stretch-magnitude dependent amount of rFE established in the stretch phase and were independent of the force reached at the end of the stretch phase in SSCs. Among many competing theories, these results can potentially be explained with the idea that there is a length-specific engagement of a passive structural element at the initial length of muscle activation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".