Throughput Optimization With Delay Guarantee for Massive Random Access of M2M Communications in Industrial IoT
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The machine-to-machine (M2M) communication is an emerging technology that is widely utilized in a vast number of industrial Internet-of-Things (IIoT) applications. Due to the diversity of IIoT applications, provisioning of heterogeneous delay requirements of delay-sensitive machine type devices (MTDs) while optimizing the access efficiency of delay-tolerate MTDs becomes a critical challenge for M2M communications. To address this issue, a multigroup analytical framework for massive random access of M2M communications in IIoT is proposed in this article. Specifically, we consider delay-sensitive MTDs and delay-tolerate MTDs coexist in the network, and those MTDs are divided into multiple groups according to their delay requirements. The access behavior of each MTD is characterized by a double-queue model. Based on this model, the throughput and the mean access delay of each group are characterized. It is found that for each group, the mean access delay decreases as the throughput increases and is minimized when the throughput is maximized. To achieve the maximum throughput of delay-tolerate MTDs under delay constraints of delay-sensitive MTDs, the backoff parameters of delay-sensitive MTDs should be tuned according to the delay constraints while that of delay-tolerate MTDs should be tuned further according to the aggregate packet arrival rate and the number of MTDs in each group. It is further demonstrated that the optimal tuning of backoff parameters is robust against the burstiness of input traffic. The analysis sheds important light on the access design of M2M communications in IIoT with delay constraints.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".