MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2968945630 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2019.2935548

Throughput Optimization With Delay Guarantee for Massive Random Access of M2M Communications in Industrial IoT

2019· article· en· W2968945630 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIoT Networks and Protocols
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesChinese Academy of SciencesNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsBurstinessComputer scienceComputer networkThroughputRandom accessNetwork packetQueueing theoryProvisioningWirelessTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The machine-to-machine (M2M) communication is an emerging technology that is widely utilized in a vast number of industrial Internet-of-Things (IIoT) applications. Due to the diversity of IIoT applications, provisioning of heterogeneous delay requirements of delay-sensitive machine type devices (MTDs) while optimizing the access efficiency of delay-tolerate MTDs becomes a critical challenge for M2M communications. To address this issue, a multigroup analytical framework for massive random access of M2M communications in IIoT is proposed in this article. Specifically, we consider delay-sensitive MTDs and delay-tolerate MTDs coexist in the network, and those MTDs are divided into multiple groups according to their delay requirements. The access behavior of each MTD is characterized by a double-queue model. Based on this model, the throughput and the mean access delay of each group are characterized. It is found that for each group, the mean access delay decreases as the throughput increases and is minimized when the throughput is maximized. To achieve the maximum throughput of delay-tolerate MTDs under delay constraints of delay-sensitive MTDs, the backoff parameters of delay-sensitive MTDs should be tuned according to the delay constraints while that of delay-tolerate MTDs should be tuned further according to the aggregate packet arrival rate and the number of MTDs in each group. It is further demonstrated that the optimal tuning of backoff parameters is robust against the burstiness of input traffic. The analysis sheds important light on the access design of M2M communications in IIoT with delay constraints.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.652
Threshold uncertainty score0.369

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it