MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2968952054 · doi:10.1177/2474126419857207

Dislocation of a Scleral-Fixated, Hydrophobic, Single-Piece Acrylic Intraocular Lens Secondary to Eyelet Fracture From Gore-Tex Suture

2019· article· en· W2968952054 on OpenAlexaff
R. Rishi Gupta, Mark E. Seamone, André S. Pollmann, Daniel M. O’Brien, Darrell R. Lewis

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of VitreoRetinal Diseases · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntraocular Surgery and Lenses
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFibrous jointMedicineOphthalmologyIntraocular lensSurgeryDislocationMaterials scienceComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: This article reports a case of the dislocation of a scleral-fixated enVista MX60 (Bausch + Lomb) intraocular lens (IOL) secondary to eyelet fracture at the point of contact with a Gore-Tex (W.L. Gore & Associates) suture. Methods: A case report is discussed. Results: An 81-year-old woman presented with decreased vision secondary to a dislocated Gore-Tex scleral-sutured enVista MX60 IOL in the left eye 14 months after surgery. The patient returned to the operating room for IOL exchange, and intraoperatively it was confirmed that the eyelet of the lens had fractured secondary to tension from the Gore-Tex suture. Conclusions: To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first report of eyelet fracture in an enVista MX60 scleral-sutured IOL secondary to tension from a Gore-Tex suture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0060.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of VitreoRetinal DiseasesSame topicIntraocular Surgery and LensesFrench-language works237,207