La sociologie comme elle s’écrit. De Bourdieu à Latour, de J-L. Fabiani
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Jean-Louis Fabiani publicó su libro La sociologie comme elle s’écrit. De Bourdieu à Latour (La sociología tal como se escribe. De Bourdieu a Latour) en la colección Cas de figure de la Editorial de la Escuela de Altos Estudios en Ciencias Sociales (ehess). Es preciso recordar que este sociólogo galo fue antiguo alumno de la prestigiosa Escuela Normal Superior (ens), antes de obtener la agregación de Filosofía y de ocupar el puesto de Director Regional de Asuntos Culturales en Córcega entre 1988 y 1991. Su carrera universitaria se ha desarrollado esencialmente en la ehess, primero como maestro de investigación y, posteriormente, como director de estudios. Es igualmente investigador asociado en el Centro de Estudios Sociológicos y Políticos Raymond Aron (cespra) que depende del Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (cnrs). Así mismo, ha sido profesor invitado, en varias ocasiones, en las universidades de Chicago y Michigan, así como catedrático asociado en la Universidad de Montreal. Desde el 2011, es catedrático senior en la Universidad Europa Central de Budapest, en el seno del Departamento de Sociología y Antropología.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".