MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2968965388 · doi:10.15446/rcs.v42n2.71341

La sociologie comme elle s’écrit. De Bourdieu à Latour, de J-L. Fabiani

2019· article· es· W2968965388 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Eguzki Urteaga

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Colombiana de Sociología · 2019
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSociologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Jean-Louis Fabiani publicó su libro La sociologie comme elle s’écrit. De Bourdieu à Latour (La sociología tal como se escribe. De Bourdieu a Latour) en la colección Cas de figure de la Editorial de la Escuela de Altos Estudios en Ciencias Sociales (ehess). Es preciso recordar que este sociólogo galo fue antiguo alumno de la prestigiosa Escuela Normal Superior (ens), antes de obtener la agregación de Filosofía y de ocupar el puesto de Director Regional de Asuntos Culturales en Córcega entre 1988 y 1991. Su carrera universitaria se ha desarrollado esencialmente en la ehess, primero como maestro de investigación y, posteriormente, como director de estudios. Es igualmente investigador asociado en el Centro de Estudios Sociológicos y Políticos Raymond Aron (cespra) que depende del Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (cnrs). Así mismo, ha sido profesor invitado, en varias ocasiones, en las universidades de Chicago y Michigan, así como catedrático asociado en la Universidad de Montreal. Desde el 2011, es catedrático senior en la Universidad Europa Central de Budapest, en el seno del Departamento de Sociología y Antropología.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.995
Threshold uncertainty score0.073

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.006
Scholarly communication0.0090.006
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0040.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Colombiana de SociologíaSame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207