Longdendale Lights: Perspectives (I) and Longdendale Lights: Perspectives (II)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A collaborative video and a conference paper relating to the wider ideas and processes applied, made with American poet Laura-Gray Street, 'From Longdendale valley to Shinning Clough', was presented as part of an international conference 'Cross, Multi, Intra, Trans' conference at the Sheffield Arts Institute, Sheffield Hallam University, UK in September 2017. The Cross, Multi, Intra, Trans conference was presented by two research networks; The Biennial Conference of the Association for the Study of Literature and Environment, U.K. and Ireland in association with LAND2. The 'Cross, Multi, Intra, Trans' conference featured an international range of speakers from the United Kingdom, Ireland, Holland, Germany and the USA, and Canada. It took place over 2 days in September 2017. Street and Creamer presented a paper, 'Longdendale Lights: Perspectives (I) and (II)', outlining the history of their collaboration and the wider issues their work raised in the context of the conference, as part of a panel called 'Inter-genre Inter-national: Artists in Collaboration'. American poet Laura-Gray Street is Associate Professor of English, Director of Creative Writing and Visiting Writers Series Program at Randolph College, USA. Details of the Panel Street and Creamer featured also included: Panel 1: Cantor 9024 Inter-genre Inter-national: Artists in Collaboration CHAIR: Judith Tucker Anne-Marie Creamer and Laura-Gray Street - Longdendale Lights: Perspectives (I) and Longdendale Lights: Perspectives (II). Ann Fisher-Wirth and Barbara Howey - Damage Poison Beauty Ooze: a poet and a painter respond to contemporary landscapes All those taking part were interested in place, landscape and environment, also featuring field trips around a richly diverse area so, aptly, we know where we are. The conference allowed participants to fully engage with “the challenge of the environmental humanities as a transdisciplinary matrix” (Heise) and aimed to deepen analysis of what it is to work across disciplines; the conference remit aimed to bring critical and aesthetic enquiry into dialogue to explore how creative practice not only informs critical analysis, but is also a critical tool in itself. The conference panel I was part set out to encourage CROSS MULTI INTER TRANS thinking. Other important UAL Research Online links about this work: • Details of the art-work that is the subject of this conference presentation and paper, 'From Longdendale valley to Shinning Clough' https://ualresearchonline.arts.ac.uk/13902/ • 'In the Open' exhibition at Sheffield Institute of Arts Gallery: featuring the collaborative digital film ‘Longdendale Lights to Shining Clough’, made with American poet Laura-Gray Street. https://ualresearchonline.arts.ac.uk/13679/ • 'From Longdendale valley to Shinning Clough' was also featured in the exhibition and book, The First Biennial Sino-British Contemporary Art Exhibition, which can be found at this UAL Research On-line link; http://ualresearchonline.arts.ac.uk/13678/
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.021 | 0.016 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.009 | 0.012 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.088 | 0.015 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".