MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2969093551

Monitoring Seasonal Variations in Treatment Performance of a Wastewater Stabilization Pond with Algal Blooms and pH Fluctuations

2018· article· en· W2969093551 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
 Hall, Champagne

Bibliographic record

VenueWDSA / CCWI Joint Conference Proceedings · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceEffluentWastewaterSewage treatmentWater qualityNutrientAlgal bloomPhosphorusNitrateEnvironmental engineeringEutrophicationSewageEcologyChemistryBiologyPhytoplankton
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 2012, Environment Canada updated the Wastewater System Effluent Regulations in an effort to reduce the 150 billion litres of untreated wastewater being discharged into Canadian waters annually. The revised regulations will result in the commissioning of over $20 billion in wastewater infrastructure upgrades for municipalities. Many small, rural and remote municipalities use passive wastewater treatment systems, such as wastewater stabilization ponds (WSPs), as sustainable alternatives to conventional wastewater treatment due to their ease of operation, minimal energy input and low costs. WSPs can effectively attenuate nutrient loads while also providing environmental conditions suitable for the removal of pathogens through naturally occurring biological, chemical and physical treatment mechanisms. However, since WSPs are open systems, they are susceptible to variations in external conditions. In particular, they are conducive to algal blooms and high pH events during the summer seasons, with warmer temperatures and higher hydraulic retention times. Water chemistry parameters, temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, Escherichia coli, nitrate and total phosphorus, were collected from a WSP system in eastern Ontario, with excessive algal growth, over a five-year period. The removal efficiencies of various water quality parameters and indicator organisms for each season were used to determine seasonal treatment and disinfection performance of the system. Multivariate statistical tests and time series analyses were used to determine the strength and type of relationships influencing the WSP treatment for different seasons. Nitrate and E. coli removal were shown to be lowest during the winter periods at 95.6% and 27.9%, while total phosphorus remained consistent throughout the monitoring period. E. coli removal was shown to be significantly negatively correlated with pH (ρ =-0.268, p=0.05) and DO (ρ=-0.390, p=0.01), using Spearman’s correlation coefficient. Seasonal Kendall tests revealed dissolved oxygen levels and nitrate concentrations both significantly decreased during the fall period. This research will be used directly to inform the monitoring program for the WSP system at the site and contributes to the continued improvement of WSP design and performance. The multivariate statistical methodologies presented in this research offer an insightful approach to the monitoring of water treatment systems where large datasets are generated and the extraction of key relationships is critical in informing system design and operation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.120
Threshold uncertainty score0.459

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWDSA / CCWI Joint Conference ProceedingsSame topicSoil and Water Nutrient DynamicsFrench-language works237,207