MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2969128103 · doi:10.1111/evj.13158

A novel 13‐plex STR typing system for individual identification and parentage testing of donkeys ( <i>Equus asinus</i> )

2019· article· en· W2969128103 on OpenAlexaff
Wanyi Dang, Songyang Shang, X. Zhang, Yan Yu, David M. Irwin, Z. Wang, S. Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueEquine Veterinary Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersMinistry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China
KeywordsDonkeyEquus asinusMicrosatelliteBiologyGeneticsMultiplex polymerase chain reactionMultiplexTypingGenotypeBuccal swabPopulationAllelePolymerase chain reactionGenetic diversityMedicineGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Previous studies investigating donkey parentage and genetic diversity used horse-specific multiplex systems. However, several mis-allele and null-allele issues were found with some of the horse primers when used in donkeys. In 2017, the International Society for Animal Genetics (ISAG) recommended 13 dinucleotide short tandem repeats (STRs) (AHT4, ASB23, HMS2, HMS3, HMS6, HMS7, HMS18, HTG7, HTG10, TKY297, TKY312, TKY337 and TKY343) as a core panel that should be used to identify individuals and to test for parentage in donkeys. To date, no single multiplex STR typing system containing all 13 donkey STRs recommended by the ISAG has been reported. OBJECTIVES: To establish a novel and donkey-specific multiplex STR typing system containing all 13 recommended STRs. STUDY DESIGN: Assay development and validation in field population. METHODS: Primers for seven of the STRs were redesigned and conditions for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were optimised. We analysed the allele sequences, sensitivity, species-specificity and stutter ratios of this new system. RESULTS: A 13-plex STR typing system for donkey was established. A full profile could be generated from a single PCR reaction using as little as 5 ng of DNA template with the 13 pairs of primers labelled with fluorescent dyes. An allele ladder, containing 101 alleles from the 13 STRs, was generated. No full genotype profile was generated with these primers if DNA from humans, or 11 other commonly encountered animals, was used. Genotypes could be generated for the horse and horse-donkey hybrids (mule and hinny). Stutter ratios and population genetic parameters were calculated based on samples from 150 donkeys. The combined probabilities of paternity exclusion for this system were 0.988907326 (CPEduo) and 0.999665018 (CPEtrio). MAIN LIMITATIONS: This system cannot detect sex. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that our donkey-specific 13-plex STR typing system is sensitive, species-specific and robust for individual identification, paternity testing and population genetic analysis in donkeys, and has potential forensic applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.743
Threshold uncertainty score0.497

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEquine Veterinary JournalSame topicGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestockFrench-language works237,207