MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2969159229 · doi:10.1109/isgt.2019.8791564

Vulnerabilities of Line Current Differential Relays to Cyber-Attacks

2019· article· en· W2969159229 on OpenAlexaff
Amir Ameli, Aram Kirakosyan, Khaled A. Saleh, Ehab F. El‐Saadany

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Security and Resilience
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources CanadaUniversity of Waterloo
FundersKhalifa University of Science, Technology and ResearchUtah Agricultural Experiment Station
KeywordsMicrogridRelayGlobal Positioning SystemLine (geometry)Protective relayComputer scienceComputer securityDifferential (mechanical device)Computer networkElectrical engineeringVoltageTelecommunicationsEngineeringPower (physics)PhysicsAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Being fast and highly reliable under different conditions, line current differential relays (LCDRs) are high-end protective devices that are deployed to protect DC and critical AC lines. LCDRs, however, are vulnerable to cyber attacks, since this type of relay is dependent on communication infrastructure and the global positioning system (GPS). This susceptibility may enable attackers to fool LCDRs into issuing unwarranted trip signals, and potentially to create an instability if several attacks are coordinated. Through case-studies, this paper shows how coordinated attacks against LCDRs in DC and AC networks can create a voltage collapse in the system. The case-studies are carried on the IEEE 14-bus AC network, as well as on a DC microgrid.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSmart Grid Security and ResilienceFrench-language works237,207