The impact of different volume fractions of crystalline structures on the electrochemical behaviour of Mg <sub>67</sub> Zn <sub>29</sub> Ca <sub>4</sub> alloys for biomedical applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this work, the influence of various volume fractions of the crystalline phase in an amorphous matrix of Mg67Zn29Ca4 alloys was investigated for its corrosion resistance for biodegradable applications. An amorphous Mg67Zn29Ca4 alloy was successfully fabricated using melt casting into a copper mould. Then, to obtain different ratios of the crystalline phase in an amorphous matrix, the obtained amorphous rods with 3 mm diameters were annealed at 190, 230, 250, and 400°C. The volume fraction of the crystalline phase was measured by X-ray diffraction, and the microstructures of the obtained alloys were determined based on scanning electron microscopy images. Electrochemical testing was conducted in simulated body fluid at 37°C. This report shows that the ratio of the volume fractions of amorphous and crystalline phases in alloy microstructures strongly influences their corrosion behaviours. The alloy with a fully amorphous structure was the most resistive in the analysed media.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".