MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2969228880 · doi:10.1111/micc.12586

Tetraethylammonium, glibenclamide, and 4‐aminopyridine modulate post‐occlusive reactive hyperemia in non‐glabrous human skin with no roles of <scp>NOS</scp> and <scp>COX</scp>

2019· article· en· W2969228880 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrocirculation · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThermoregulation and physiological responses
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsGlibenclamideTetraethylammoniumChemistryPharmacologyPotassium channelChannel blockerNitric oxide synthasePotassium channel blockerAnesthesiaNitric oxideMedicineInternal medicineEndocrinologyPotassiumCalcium

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Objectives Post‐occlusive reactive hyperemia ( PORH ) following arterial occlusion is widely used to assess cutaneous microvascular function, though the underlying mechanisms remain to be fully elucidated. We evaluated the hypothesis that Ca 2+ ‐activated, ATP ‐sensitive, and voltage‐gated K + channels ( K C a , K ATP , and K V channels, respectively) contribute to PORH while nitric oxide synthase ( NOS ) and cyclooxygenase ( COX ) do not. Methods On separate occasions, cutaneous blood flow (laser Doppler flowmetry) was monitored before and following 5‐min arterial occlusion at forearm skin sites treated via microdialysis with the following: Experiment 1 (n = 11): (a) lactated Ringer solution (Control), (b) 10 mM N ω ‐nitro‐ L ‐arginine ( NOS inhibitor), (c) 10 mM ketorolac ( COX inhibitor), and (d) combined NOS + COX inhibition; Experiment 2 (n = 14): (a) lactated Ringer solution (Control), (b) 50 mM tetraethylammonium (non‐selective K C a channel blocker), (c) 5 mM glibenclamide (non‐specific K ATP channel blocker), and (d) 10 mM 4‐aminopyridine (non‐selective K V channel blocker). Results Separate and combined NOS and COX inhibition did not influence PORH . Conversely, tetraethylammonium and glibenclamide attenuated, whereas 4‐aminopyridine augmented PORH . Conclusions We showed that tetraethylammonium, glibenclamide, and 4‐aminopyridine modulate PORH with no roles of NOS and COX in human non‐glabrous forearm skin in vivo. Thus, cutaneous PORH changes could reflect altered K + channel function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.791
Threshold uncertainty score0.926

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it