Un autre monde est possible : l’utopie pratiquée par l’Université coopérative internationale (1976-1992)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce texte présente l’expérience de l’Université coopérative internationale (UCI), un réseau francophone de chercheurs et d’acteurs engagés dans les sciences sociales des religions, le développement régional, l’économie sociale et l’éducation permanente. En un peu plus d’une décennie (de la fin des années 1970 au début des années 1990), de nombreux partenariats, projets de coopération, rapports et publications scientifiques ont émané de ce réseau international. Son but était de fédérer plusieurs groupes de recherche nés à l’initiative des anciens étudiants du Collège coopératif de Paris. Active en Europe, en Afrique, en Amérique latine et au Canada, l’UCI a suscité de multiples collaborations Nord-Sud, Sud-Sud et Nord-Nord, dont les retombées sont encore visibles aujourd’hui, et contribué à conférer une légitimité à bon nombre de chercheurs, notamment sur le continent américain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.012 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".