Laboratory and in situ sound absorption measurement under a synthetized diffuse acoustic field
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article reports numerical and experimental results concerning the estimation of the diffuse field sound absorption coefficient of several different materials under a synthetized diffuse acoustic field excitation in laboratory and in situ conditions. The proposed measurement method is based on a sound field reproduction approach and a synthetic array of acoustic monopoles facing the material to be tested. Numerical simulations are first conducted to optimize the geometrical parameters of the method and to compute theoretical sound absorption coefficients of the considered materials. Measurements on a set of six typical acoustic materials are then conducted following the standardized reverberant room method as well as the proposed approach in a hemi-anechoic room and in two realistic rooms. Albeit showing limitations in the low-frequency domain, the proposed method enables a significant reduction of the tested specimen dimensions compared with the reverberant room method and allows performing tests in non-ideal acoustic environments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it