Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dr. Dawn Martin-Hill holds a PhD in Cultural Anthropology and is one of the original foundersof the Indigenous Studies Program at McMaster University. She is the inaugural Paul R.McPherson Indigenous Studies Chair. Dr. Martin-Hill’s research is grounded in the principle thatsolution-based research in the area of Indigenous health must occur alongside building capacityfor community collaborations. She has embodied this principle through her numerouscommunity commitments: serving as Chair of the Indigenous Elders and Youth Council topromote the protection and preservation of Indigenous Knowledge systems, serving as an expertwitness on traditional medicines, and supporting reconciliation efforts to improve health servicesdelivery to First Nations through the “Harmonization of Traditional Medicine” in partnershipwith Six Nations Health Services. While working with communities, Dr. Martin-Hill has lednumerous grants funded by both the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC)and Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) to conduct Indigenous knowledge researchfocused on Indigenous youth, women, language, ceremonies, traditional medicine and well-being.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".