Thermal and optical characterization of multiple hydrogen bonded liquid crystals derived from mesogenic and non-mesogenic compounds: experimental and theoretical (DFT) studies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A set of new cyclic multiple hydrogen bonded liquid crystals (HBLCs) have been designed and synthesized from citric acid (CA) and 4-dodecyloxybenzoic acid (12OBA). The presence of intermolecular hydrogen bonds (H-bonds) between non-mesogenic and mesogenic compounds has been confirmed by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and density functional theory (DFT) studies. The hydrogen bonding interactions were explained from natural bond orbital (NBO) analysis using B3LYP/6-311G(d,p) level of theory. Additionally, the Mulliken atomic charges reveal the nature of charge distribution in the HBLC complex. The dynamics of phase transitions and the corresponding stability factor have been evaluated using polarizing optical microscopy (POM), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and electrostatic potential (ESP) analysis. Highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) energies of the CA+12OBA complex is theoretically calculated and experimentally verified. It is found that the variation in the mole ratio in mesogenic with non-mesogenic compound induces the stabilized nematic (N) and smectic X (Sm X) phases. Photocatalytic activity of the CA+12OBA HBLC complex reveals the usage of its optical applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".