MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2969332636 · doi:10.21608/iccae.2008.45576

Enhancing the mechanical properties of concrete structures subjected to explosives impact using non-metallic geogrids

2008· article· en· W2969332636 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe International Conference on Civil and Architecture Engineering · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Response to Dynamic Loads
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExplosive materialMaterials scienceMetalComposite materialForensic engineeringEngineeringMetallurgyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The strengthening and retrofitting of existing reinforced concrete structures againstblast or projectile loadings is a pressing problem in the current political environment.The usual approach to protect sensitive structures is generally in the form ofestablishing a barrier line away from the structure. Although this approach can bequite effective, it still does not address the problems associated with long-rangeprojectiles hitting the structure. Current research aims at solving this problem by anew strengthening technique using protective non-metallic geogrids applied on theexisting concrete surface. Results of initial impact loading studies will be presented todemonstrate that non-metallic grid retrofits provide significant improvements in theimpact resistance capacity of reinforced concrete slabs. In particular, slabs retrofittedwith polyethylene grids show better performance compared to those retrofitted withother materials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.203
Threshold uncertainty score0.519

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it